Overall, I found this chapter really helpful as a guide for conceptualizing my documentary. I think that it is important for me to shift my thinking from the theoretical side to the practical side at this point in the process, so that I can feel more prepared for the production process. I feel that I have reached immersion in my research, but not as much in the practice and process of documentary filmmaking that I will dive into very soon. I don’t think that I’ve made any real decisions on my creative approach yet, but I’m beginning to get a better understanding of what I do and don’t want my project to be. I definitely don’t want to make a stuffy, PBS-style documentary with interviews and overlaid images that lacks any real character or spirit. In fact, I think that my biggest priority with this project is to capture the spirit and tone of the horror hosting genre and what makes it so special. Bernard made some points that really resonated with me, about deciding what is interesting about your topic and going with it, and working within the world of the topic you are focusing on. I thought her point about creating events or situations for the documentary was really interesting, and I’d like to potentially incorporate it. I have been thinking it would be really cool to take the approach of learning how to become a horror host and then creating a character and ending with a hosted drive-in event. However, I’ve been a bit torn about whether I want to take that approach, because I think it would be hard to also incorporate the expository content alongside it. Maybe I could frame it as learning about horror hosting from the perspective of those involved in it. So I could hear from horror hosts and fans alike about the character of the genre, and incorporate it into creating the horror host-iest horror host of them all (very meta). I have overall been struggling with how to combine my theoretical framework with my actual project. I think that a good approach would be to create a characterization of the genre based on my research, and then figure out ways that I can incorporate those elements into the approach, style and techniques of my documentary overall. It’s felt at times that the conventions of documentary are at odds with capturing the horror hosting genre. But Bernard’s writing made me feel more optimistic that I can incorporate what I’ve learned without stating it outright. The decisions that I make when producing my documentary can still speak to my research, and I can publish my research in an academic context later on if I want to. I am realizing as I write this that I need to begin viewing my research as contributing to my documentary, and not my documentary as contributing to my research. Reading this chapter felt like it opened up a lot of possibilities for my project, and I am definitely realizing that I need to shift my priorities from creating something academically rigorous (I’ll do that in my paper anyways) to creating something that captures spirit and tone in an authentic way.
This past couple of weeks I have really had my hands full with production on a short film for another class, but I have continued to read sources about my topic and build my theoretical framework. I have also learned a lot of skills through the short film’s production process, and made a lot of connections that will serve me well for my master’s project too. It has helped me shift to a more production-focused mindset and I’m beginning to have a clearer picture of what my project will be, not just what the topic is.
References
Bernard, S. C. (2016). Creative Approach. In Documentary storytelling: Creative nonfiction on screen (4th ed., pp. 89–99). Focal Press.
No comments:
Post a Comment